Teacher or Learning Architect?

“I think…”, “I feel like …”, “Try this…”, “It sounds like…”, “I’m not sure how exactly to describe it, but it’s like…”, “Ahhh…”, “I’m not sure…”, “There has to be…”, “It is…but it isn’t…”, “It’s not…”, “How do you…?”, “I think you are right…”, “What do you think…?”, “We need to think about it in a different way…”, “Can we…?”, “Is that because…?”, “Ohhhh!”, “Ooooo…”  ….

All of the above statements are the inquiry utterances of a group of adult learners engaging in inquiry learning at a recent inquiry based learning workshop that I had the opportunity to facilitate. One of the biggest misconceptions about inquiry based learning is that it is only about asking questions and finding answers. Go back and read the list of utterances again. Inquiry is so much more than asking questions and seeking answers.

Kathy Short put it best when she described inquiry as both a stance and a state of tension. When I share this definition of inquiry with adult learners, they often ask, “but what do stance and tension really mean?”

According to dictionary.com, the second definition they provide for stance is: a mental or emotional position adopted with respect to something. So, inquiry is a mental or emotional position we adopt with respect to learning. Inquiry tension lies in the mental or emotional position of the stance. When we think, feel or believe we have to figure something out, or find out the truth by either confirming something we already believe to be true or dis-confirming something we’ve assumed to be true, or figuring out something that is totally new, we are activating the inquiry stance. As educators, it is our role to be the inquiry architects as we take learners on a journey through an inquiry cycle (there are many! just pick one or make your own hybrid!). Many times I hear other educators lament, “but they just don’t ask questions. How do I get them to ask questions?” Therein lies our first mistake. When we limit the inquiry stance to just asking questions, we limit the potential for meaningful and contextualized inquiry stance learning. Take a step back and really listen to what the learners in your classroom are saying. If you don’t hear anything, then perhaps the flaw lies in the designer and not the learner. Inquiry begs us to examine and challenge our own beliefs and assumptions (our own mental and emotional position) about teaching and learning. Do we see ourselves as teacher or as learning architect? 

About Tanya de Hoog

Tanya de Hoog is an educator of 20 years. She is passionate about the inquiry stance and constructivist learning. Tanya has taught a range of grades, and is currently a curriculum coordinator, administrator and workshop facilitator for IBA (PYP). A constructivist at heart, Tanya enjoys collaborating with other educators to design and build curriculum, and reflect on best practices for teaching and learning.
This entry was posted in Inquiry and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Teacher or Learning Architect?

  1. Jane Nordli Jessep says:

    Have you ever explored the work being done by researchers at Project Zero (Harvard Graduate School of Education)? Lots of work on inquiry as the basis for learning. I coach for WIDE World of Online Learning which sprang out of the PZ work and is now housed in the Programs of Professional Education at HGSE. We have so many IB schools participating in our courses. Also, have you ever attended the Project Zero Classroom, a summer institute held annually at Harvard? You would find yourself amongst many kindred spirits. Thanks for this blog posting. Good stuff.


    • Hi Jane,
      Yes I am very familiar with the Project Zero work and love it. I constantly use the thinking routines and refer other educators to it (my personal favorite is Observe, Think, Wonder). I attended a great session at the IBA regional conference in July presented by 3 educators, 2 from IB schools, and one fro a non-IB school who shared lots of great insights into how their schools use the visible thinking routines to support inquiry. I’ve not attended the summer institute – I imagine it would be incredible! Thanks so much for your feedback. Glad you enjoyed the post.


  2. Tanya, couldn’t agree with you more… as we look at refining our school curriculum and train new teachers in the delivery of inquiry based pedagogy, this understanding is crucial… love the term ‘learning architect’! 🙂


  3. Yes, and when we do all of this we end up asking questions. At least I do.


  4. Bart Miller says:

    Great post, thank you for sharing your insights. The term I coined for this is ‘metateaching’, and your ‘architect’ characterization is really perfect. Excellent ways to think at this point in preparing for the new school year. Related post, Metateaching: Teachers as Anthropologists and Designers


  5. Pingback: Building a Framework | Northern Art Teacher

  6. Pingback: Friday | Building Capacity StCP

  7. Pingback: Good blogs and interesting ideas | otisa

  8. Pingback: Inspired Teachers lead Inspired Practice | Misty Paterson

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s